|
Treasury and Fund Management
|
Forecasted Monetary Policy
|
|
This
document contains forecasted monetary policy FY12 in which some variable
change and result of these change variables.
|
According to last monetary
Policy statement April 2012 there are multiple challenges faced by the economy
in which inflation , international oil prices , weak exports and insufficient
foreign financial flows consistent decline in private investment is also an
important element.
Basic
Objective of Monetary Policy
·
Accelerate economic growth
·
Preserve reasonable price stability
·
Maintain High-level of employment
·
Ensuring order financial market/Financial Intuitions
·
Safeguard country Foreign exchange reserve
·
Monetary stability (avoidance of inflationary
and deflationary pressure)
Instrument
of Monetary Policy
There are various tools
available through which monetary policy is arranged and prepared
Bank
Rate (Discount Rate)
It is the rate at which
state bank lends short term credit to the commercial banks. Current bank rate
is 12 percent the reason for reduction in discount rate is to increase the
credit supply. If lesser the discount rate investor will borrow more and investment
will increase. If the discount rate remains the same investor have the opportunity
to borrow more at lesser rate.
Open
Market Operations
Buying and selling of
government securities in order to expend and contract the money supply into
banking system.Currenty government issue Tbills for collecting the money others
tools are :
·
Rationing of credit
·
Sets the limit for credit to private
and public sector.
·
Changes in cash reserve requirements
·
Statuary liquidity ratio
·
Regulation of consumer credit
·
The use of moral persuasion and publicity
According to monetary policy April 2012 State Bank
keeps rate unchanged at 12 percent
As mentioned above Pakistan faced some challenges in which basic challenge is financing its fiscal and external current account deficits. The size of these deficits may not be considered large given the current state of falling private sector investment demand in the economy. A reflection of overall low aggregate demand can be seen in the declining inflation trend, contraction in the real private sector credit, and falling volume of imports. The SBP’s monetary policy stance in FY12 so far, a cumulative reduction of 200 basis points, has been largely framed in this context. And same will be remained in the next monetary policy because less exports and low investment in the country. The lack of diversified and sustainable financing sources has resulted in substantial borrowings from the banking system by the government and declining foreign exchange reserves. This has squeezed the availability of credit for the private sector and increased the pressure on rupee liquidity.
The uncertain market
position and liquidity flows have lead to excess volatility in short term
interest rates and increased the challenges of monetary management. The main
reasons for this uncertainty include:
·
A sharper deterioration in the external
current account deficit,
·
A declining trend of foreign inflows, and
·
A higher currency to deposit ratio
However the market interest rate KIBOR
followed the policy reduction rate.
Due to declining in interest
rate environment leads to larger investment and promote the growth in Large-scale
Manufacturing (LSM) and it is expected to help the pickup in private sector
credit and confidence. The LSM sector grew by 1.5 percent during July-November,
FY12, which is in contrast to an average contraction of 3.1 percent during the
same period of last three years. And if the interest rate remains the same LSM
LSM will grow 2 percent Moreover, credit to the private sector has expanded more
than 238.
Following point should be eliminated to increase the growth of LSM.
Following point should be eliminated to increase the growth of LSM.
First, energy
shortages, unfavorable law and order conditions, and an uncertain political
environment, the desired boost in business confidence and thus private sector
credit may not take place. Second, profitability of the textile sector, a major
user of private sector credit, was better in FY11 due to higher cotton prices.
This would facilitate repayments or keep the demand for fresh credit to a
minimum in FY12. Third, the utilization of installed industrial capacity is
considerably low and continues to decline, which is inhibiting credit demand
for fixed investment. Fourth, all of the fresh credit disbursement in H1FY12
was utilized to meet the working capital requirements, which implies that a
significant part of this credit will be retired in H2-FY12.
Thus, the full year expansion in credit to the private sector is expected to remain weak for yet another year in FY12 despite interest rate reductions. Its year-on-year growth is already negative in real terms and indicates depressed private investment demand in the economy. Due to government borrowings from the banks and banks are avoid lending to risky projects.
Thus, the full year expansion in credit to the private sector is expected to remain weak for yet another year in FY12 despite interest rate reductions. Its year-on-year growth is already negative in real terms and indicates depressed private investment demand in the economy. Due to government borrowings from the banks and banks are avoid lending to risky projects.
According to
provisional data, the government has borrowed Rs444 billion from the banking
system, during 1st July – 3rd February, FY12 to finance its current year’s
fiscal deficit. This includes Rs197 billion borrowed from the SBP and show a
YOY growth of 25.8 percent. Moreover, these borrowings are significantly higher
than the yearly financing requirements of Rs293 billion envisaged in the FY12
budget.
The provisional estimate of fiscal deficit for H1-FY12, from the financing side, shows a deficit of Rs532 billion or 2.5 percent of GDP. Given that the fiscal deficit is always higher in the second half of a fiscal year, by at least 0.5 percent of GDP during the last ten years, containing the FY12 fiscal deficit close to the government’s revised target of 4.7 percent of GDP would be difficult. Encouragingly, the tax collection by the Federal Board of Revenue during H1-FY12, at Rs840 billion, has shown a strong growth of 27.1 percent. The announcement of auction of 3G licenses in the telecommunication sector is positive development and helps to boost the economy.
The provisional estimate of fiscal deficit for H1-FY12, from the financing side, shows a deficit of Rs532 billion or 2.5 percent of GDP. Given that the fiscal deficit is always higher in the second half of a fiscal year, by at least 0.5 percent of GDP during the last ten years, containing the FY12 fiscal deficit close to the government’s revised target of 4.7 percent of GDP would be difficult. Encouragingly, the tax collection by the Federal Board of Revenue during H1-FY12, at Rs840 billion, has shown a strong growth of 27.1 percent. The announcement of auction of 3G licenses in the telecommunication sector is positive development and helps to boost the economy.
However, based on the seasonal pattern of tax collections, the full year target of Rs1952 billion still seems ambitious. At the same time, there are indications that the issue of circular debt in the energy sector remains and losses of major Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) continue to increase. The likelihood of slippages on the expenditures side on account of subsides , over and above the budgeted amount , cannot be ruled out the delay in these subsidy payments may have implications for resolving the circular debt.
The risks to external position have also increased due to worsening terms of trade, fragile global economic conditions, and continued paucity of financial inflows. In addition, $1.1 billion are scheduled to be repaid to the IMF in H2-FY12. The SBP’s foreign exchange reserves have already declined to $12.2 billion as on 9th February 2012 from $14.8 billion at end-June 2011. Rupee dollar exchange depreciated by 2.5 percent
Growth in imports of petroleum product is 33.7 percent on the back of elevated international oil prices, total imports have increased to $19.7 billion in H1-FY12. The volume of imports remained quiet, which indicates moderation in domestic demand pressures. Given the rising tensions in the US-Iran relations and political uncertainty in the Middle East region, the oil prices are unlikely to increase significantly in the near future therefore import are projected to 12.5 to 14.5 and may be15.5 percent.
Similarly, while the falling cotton prices played their part in sharper than expected slowdown in export receipts, $12 billion in H1-FY12, the volume of exports have also declined considerably. Assuming that these trends would continue in H2-FY12 export receipts are projected to show a decline of 3 to 5 percent in FY12. Incorporating a steady flow of workers’ remittances, the external current account deficit is expected to remain in the range of $3.5 billion to $5.5 billion or 1.5 to 2.4 percent of GDP.
The real challenge is to finance this projected external current account deficit. The actual net capital and financial inflows during H1-FY12 was only $167 million due to decline in both the direct and portfolio investments and shortfalls in official flows. Assuming that all the official flows contemplated by the government are realized – $500 million from the issuance of euro bonds, $800 million from the privatization proceeds of PTCL, and budgeted loans 3 from international financial institution. Net foreign inflow raised by 3.8 billion
These fiscal and external developments have resulted in a skewed composition of monetary aggregates. In particular, the increase in the Net Domestic Asset (NDA) component of M2 is disproportionally large while the Net Foreign Assets (NFA) has contracted. Given its strong correlation with inflation. It increases to 12 to 13 percent.
The changing composition of
M2 requires a careful interpretation. For instance, the deterioration in the
external sector is mostly due to adverse terms of trade developments and
uncertain official inflows and may not be a sign of rising aggregate demand.
Similarly, the pressure on aggregate demand due to the government borrowings
from the banking system is being partly offset by the weak private investment
demand.
These conjectures are
supported by the decline in year‐on‐year CPI inflation to 10.1 percent in
January 2012. In addition to moderation in aggregate demand, this also reflects
improvement in domestic supplies of food items. However, there are indications
of underlying inflationary pressures. For instance, the number of CPI items
showing year-on-year inflation of more than 10 percent is significant and
mostly belong to the non-food-item.
The SBP expects the average inflation in FY12 to remain in the range of 11 to 12 percent, which implies an uptick in inflation in H2-FY12. The main reasons for this assessment include: increases in electricity and gas prices, high international oil prices, impact of exchange rate pass-through, and increase in support price for the upcoming wheat procurement season, and substantial government borrowings from the banking.system.
For inflation to come down further, the implementation of the Medium Term Budgetary Framework (MTBF) is imperative. The MTBF envisages a systematic reduction in the fiscal deficit to 3.0 percent of GDP in FY14 by increasing the tax to GDP ratio and stipulates inflation targets of 9.5 percent for FY13 and 8 percent for FY14. Decisive reforms in the energy sector can also go a long way in achieving the MTBF targets. These reforms not only will reduce the government’s reliance on banking system borrowings but also minimize the need to adjust the energy prices in a sporadic and unpredictable manner. Both these factors would help in improving the effectiveness of monetary policy and its contribution in keeping inflation low and stable.
In conclusion, despite moderate aggregate demand, pressure on rupee liquidity is likely to continue due to uncertain foreign inflows and substantial government borrowings to finance the fiscal deficit. Moreover, inflationary pressures have not eased significantly. It must be emphasized that sustainable economic recovery over the medium term would call for a sizeable increase in both the domestic and foreign private investment in the economy. For this to happen, the business confidence needs to be revived by reducing uncertainties due to energy shortages. Against this backdrop, the Central Board of Directors of SBP considers the 200 bps reduction in the policy rate, already introduced in FY12, to be appropriate and has decided to keep the policy rate unchanged at 12 percent’.
Source (edited)
This article is taken from the following
website in which some paragraph is edited.
http://finance.kalpoint.com/govt-policies/monetary-policy/monetary-policy-statement-11-02-2012.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment